McAfee apologizes for antivirus update disaster
Latest news | admin | April 24, 2010 at 2:54 pm
|
||||||||
It’s been a rough week for McAfee, but an even rougher one for many of its customers.Acknowledging the chaos it caused by pushing out a buggy antivirus update on Wednesday, McAfee apologized to its customers in the form of a late-night blog on Thursday.Barry McPherson, executive vice president of support and customer service, issued the apology on behalf of McAfee, saying the company was sorry for the headaches it caused for so many customers.At 6 a.m. PDT Wednesday, the company released a faulty update to its antivirus software that hosed computers running Windows XP with Service Pack 3. The update, a DAT file, misidentified a key Windows file called svchost.exe as a virus, causing PCs to crash or keep rebooting. The problem affected customers worldwide, including chipmaker Intel, Rhode Island hospitals, Kentucky police, University of Michigan’s medical school, and an Australian supermarket chainIn response, McAfee staffers have been working around the clock to help customers get their systems back online, McPherson said. The company believes most impacted PCs are back up.
He also detailed the fix that McAfee quickly patched together for early Thursday morning. The SuperDAT Remediation Tool stifles the updated driver that creates the false positive and then restores the svchost.exe file. McAfee said support reps are available for anyone who needs further help.
How did this problem occur in the first place? The short answer: poor testing. McAfee recently changed its quality assurance process, leading to the buggy DAT file to get past the test environment and onto the PCs of customers, MacPherson said.
To help ensure this doesn’t happen again, McAfee will add new QA steps to address any update that directly affects crucial Windows system files. McPherson also said the company will beef up its Artemis system, which provides users with cloud-based virus identification, to include a more comprehensive list of Windows system files to leave alone.
McPherson closed his blog with another apology. “Again, on behalf of McAfee, I’m very sorry for how you may have been impacted by the faulty DAT file update and thank you for your continued support and cooperation as we work to remediate the situation,” he said.
Will the apology and fix be enough to soothe angry customers? Based on some of the comments to the Thursday-night blog and to another McPherson blog on Wednesday, that may not be so easy.
Among the more than 100 comments to the Wednesday blog, a large number vented about lost hours of business and productivity and a lack of confidence in McAfee. Many also disparaged a company claim that the problem affected only a small number of customers.
There were only a few comments to the Thursday blog at press time, but a couple made their frustration clear.
“First of all let me say I am glad we have switched nearly 75 percent of our clients away from your product prior to this happening,” wrote one commenter. “I can’t imagine the chaos if we hadn’t. It was chaos enough for us running all over town and billing our clients for a software glitch on a program that we recommended to them.”
Wrote another: “If you expect customers to buy your product you…better make sure what you release is as solid as a rock. You shouldn’t be on the list of risky software downloads!”
Tags: Barry McPherson apologizes, McAfee antivirus update disaster, McAfee antivirus update issue, McAfee apologized to its customers, McAfee apologizes, McAfee bug, McAfee svchost.exe issue




















Tweet This
Digg This
Save to delicious
Stumble it
RSS Feed



Hi there, I think that your case is rather observant as it comes with lots of interesting info. On the other hand, was thinking whether you would like to interchange web links with my web portal, as I am looking to compile more contacts to further spear point and gain ground for my website. I don’t really mind you positioning my web links at the sitewide page, just getting this links on this respective page is more than enough. On the other hand, would you please message me back at my website if you are interested in swapping links, I would really like that. Thank you very much and hopefully to get a reply from you as soon as possible!
Well I see that your argument is rather observing with lots of great data. Anyhow, was curious whether you would willing to interchange web links with my web site, as I am searching to establish contacts to further expand and gain better web exposure for my site. I do not mind you positioning my contacts at the sitewide page, just getting this web links on this page is good and enough. Also, please leave a message at my website if you are keen in the link exchange, I would really value that. Thanks and I hope to get a reply from you as soon as possible!
Well said